Find out what EDF Energy is doing (image (c) EDF Energy)

The government's case for nuclear power

The case for nuclear power (Image © Chris Radburn/PA Wire)

by Business Secretary John Hutton

Our strategy, as set out in our energy White Paper last year, is designed to achieve two objectives—first, to ensure that the UK has access to secure energy supplies and, secondly and together with other countries, to tackle the global challenge of climate change.

The competition for energy resources is increasing. Access to supplies across the world is becoming increasingly politicised. As a result, the cost of energy is rising. And few who have been exposed to the science of climate change now doubt the immediacy of the threat to our planet. As the UK shifts from being a net energy exporter to a net importer, our ability to source a diverse range of secure, competitively priced energy supplies will be one of the most important challenges that we face as a country—affecting our economy, our environment and, ultimately, our national security.

A role to play

Over the next two decades, we will need to replace a third of the UK’s generating capacity, and by 2050 our electricity will need to be largely low-carbon, so we must be clear about the potential role of nuclear power. In October, we concluded a full and extensive consultation across the UK, seeking people’s views on whether new nuclear power should play a continuing role in providing Britain with the energy that it needs. I am publishing the government’s response in the form of a White Paper alongside our analysis of the comments that we received. I can confirm that, having carefully considered the responses, the government believes that new nuclear power stations should have a role to play in this country’s future energy mix alongside other low-carbon sources. The government’s view is that it is in the public interest to allow energy companies the option of investing in new nuclear power stations and that we should therefore take the active steps necessary to facilitate that.

Nuclear power has provided us with safe and secure supplies of electricity for more than half a century. It is one of the few proven low-carbon technologies that can provide base load electricity. Nuclear power currently provides us with around 19 per cent of our electricity requirements.

Twin challenges

Nuclear power will help us to meet our twin energy challenges: ensuring secure supplies and tackling climate change. First, a continuing role for nuclear power will contribute to the diversity of our energy supplies. Secondly, it will help us meet our emissions reduction targets, as every new nuclear power station will save the same amount of carbon emissions as are generated by about 1 million households. The entire lifecycle emissions from nuclear power—from uranium mining through to waste management—are only between 2 and 6 per cent of those from gas for every unit of electricity generated. Thirdly, nuclear power will reduce the costs of meeting our energy goals. Analysis of future gas and carbon price scenarios shows that nuclear is affordable and provides one of the cheapest electricity options available to reduce our carbon emissions.

Our energy suppliers recognise that, and in a world of carbon markets and high fossil fuel prices, they recognise that nuclear power makes commercial sense. For those reasons, I do not intend to set some artificial cap on the proportion of electricity that the UK should be able to generate either from nuclear power or from any other source of low-carbon energy. That would not be consistent with our long-term national interest. Given that nuclear power is a tried and tested, safe and secure form of low-carbon technology, it would be wrong in principle to rule it out now from playing any role in the UK’s energy future.

Important concerns

Not surprisingly, however, some important concerns were expressed during the consultation about nuclear power. They fall into four broad categories: safety and security, waste management, costs, and the impact of nuclear power on investment in alternative low-carbon technologies. Ensuring the safety and security of new nuclear provision will remain a top priority. Having reviewed the evidence put forward and the advice of independent regulators, we are confident that we have a robust regulatory framework. The International Atomic Energy Agency concluded that our regulatory framework is mature, flexible and transparent, with highly trained and experienced inspectors.

John Hutton MP is the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. He announced the government’s approval of a new generation of nuclear power stations in the Commons in January 2008.

The case against nuclear power (Image © Andrew Milligan/PA)

The case against nuclear power

Greenpeace UK Executive Director John Sauven isn’t convinced: “Nuclear power isn’t the answer – it’s too little, too late, at too high a price.” Read his argument against a new generation of nuclear power stations here.

 

 

Britain's nuclear revival: have your say (Image © Fabian Bimmer/AP/PA)

Britain's nuclear revival: have your say

The government has given the go-ahead for a new generation of nuclear power stations to secure the UK's energy supplies and help combat climate change. Do you support the use of nuclear power, or should the government pursue other low carbon alternatives? Have your say here.
Rate this article: PoorPoorNot GoodOkGoodExcellentExcellent
Your rating helps other users gauge the value of an article