Expert perspective: the anti-war campaigner

Retrospective: Stop the War Coalition (Image © Khalid Mohammed/AP/PA)
Iraqi soldiers stand guard at the site where a car bomb exploded and killed at least 18 people in central Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, March 13, 2008. The car bomb exploded in a popular commercial area, wounding at least 54 people (Image © AP Photo/Karim Kadim)

Lindsey German, one of the founders of the Stop the War Coalition – a British anti-war movement established in the wake of the terror attacks of 9/11 – assesses the legacy of the last five years.

In 2001, faced with the threat of war against Afghanistan, 80,000 people took to the streets of Britain. In the intervening six years there have been more than 20 national demonstrations against the War on Terror, calling for the troops to be brought home from Iraq and Afghanistan. That this campaign has been sustained over such a long period is a tribute to many thousands of hardworking activists who have canvassed and petitioned on high streets up and down the country. It is also a tribute to the many millions of supporters of the campaign who have felt strongly enough to protest again and again at the war-mongering policies of our government.

Together we have helped unite the people of the world for peace. February 15, 2003 saw more than 30 million people across the world take to the streets against Bush and Blair’s wars, including two million in Britain; the biggest protest in British history.

Political isolation

This historic campaign is far from over. Key supporters of the war have been driven from office. Tony Blair has been forced out of Downing Street; the final straw his support for Israel’s war in Lebanon in 2006. Such was the revulsion at this, even within his own party, that he was forced to announce that he would go within a year. In the USA neo-conservative architects of the war, Donald Rumsfield and John Bolton, have resigned. Spanish prime minister Jose Maria Aznar, Italian president Silvio Berlusconi, and more recently Australian prime minister John Howard all lost office as a result of their support for the Iraq war. Only Bush remains, an isolated figure with historically low poll ratings: a lame-duck president, but still dangerous and itching for another war – a war with Iran.

An Iraqi boy cries in pain after he was wounded in a roadside bomb blast that targeted an American military patrol, at a hospital in Baghdad on Thursday, March 13, 2008. Three civilians were hurt in the blast. There were no reports on possible American casualties (Image © AP Photo/Karim Kadim)

We are now five years on from the invasion of Iraq, which has lasted longer than the Second World War. For the US, daily military operations have already cost more than 12 years in Vietnam and the United States is spending $16bn a month on running costs alone in Iraq and Afghanistan. And then there is the missing cash: the $8.8bn Development Fund for Iraq under the Coalition Provisional Authority, for example; and the unaudited millions that flows through the Department of Defence.

For the UK, the combined cost of military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq over the past 12 months is more than £3bn. The total cost of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan since the invasion of Iraq in 2003 now totals about £10bn. “This is the politics of Mad Hatter priorities,” said Alan Simpson, a Labour opponent of the war. “The government is throwing money into unwinnable war zones at the same time as withholding money that creates a war zone in our hospitals.”

Iraqi female police officers demonstrate their weapons skills during a graduation ceremony at a police academy in Karbala, 50 miles south of Baghdad, Iraq, March 13, 2008 (Image © AP Photo/ Ahmed Alhussainey)

Dubious gains

The achievement in Iraq? In excess of a million deaths and a further million displaced peoples; the destruction of towns and cities; the pollution of the countryside with cluster bomb munitions and depleted uranium; and the total collapse of the country’s social infrastructure. Last word goes to Hans Blix, the former United Nations arms inspector who has claimed that the war was “clearly illegal.” “There were question marks [over the evidence of WMD], but they changed them to exclamation marks,” he said.

He has also accused America of a “witch-hunt” to justify the war. The achievement in Afghanistan? Three years after then defence secretary John Reid talked of completing the British military deployment there “without a shot being fired” and eliminating the opium harvest, the majority of the country is under Taliban control and prime minister Hamid Karzai is known as the Mayor of Kabul. Since last year, 81 British troops have died and untold numbers been maimed for life. The United Nations calculates that violent incidents have risen by 20-30% since the British took over NATO command, with at least 5,000 local deaths. Meanwhile, the opium harvest is at record levels.

Leaders of the Stop the War Coalition, CND and BMI will deliver a letter to the prime minister at 10 Downing Street at midday on Thursday 20 March calling for UK troops to be withdrawn from Iraq and Afghanistan. There will also be a protest in Whitehall and a minute's silence to mark the death of all those killed as a result of the wars and occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

By Lindsey German, convenor, Stop the War Coalition

March 2008

The invasion of Iraq: 5th anniversary special report

  • Print this article
    Print it
    E-mail a link to this page
    E-mail it
    Blog this article to your Windows Live Space
    Blog it

Vote now

Iraq invasion: 5th anniversary

  1. Five years since the US-led invasion of Iraq began, has the second Gulf War been an outstanding success or an embarrassing failure?

Vote to see results

Click here to see results without voting

Iraq invasion: 5th anniversary

  1. Five years since the US-led invasion of Iraq began, has the second Gulf War been an outstanding success or an embarrassing failure?
    1. Outstanding success: Iraq has become a much better place since the toppling of Saddam Hussein
      11%
    2. Embarrassing failure: we had no right to attack Iraq and the war has done more harm than good
      60%
    3. I'm not sure: there's no doubt Saddam was a brutal dictator, but that doesn't justify the scale of the attack
      28%
15104 responses,

Also on MSN UK News

China quake - special report (Image © ITN)
China earthquake: special report

Thousands of people have been killed in one county of China's Sichuan province alone after a major earthquake.

Embryology Bill: your views (Image © ITN)
Embryology Bill: your views

Scientists claim human-animal embryo research could help treat conditions like Parkinson's or multiple sclerosis, but opponents say it is unethical. Join the debate.